Intercultural And Intergroup Communication Research Paper Topics

Check out our list of intercultural communication topics. Social groups such a adolescents and ethnic group often have their very own culture. These cultures include literature, literature and customs. Intergroup situations (e.g. laboratory groups artificially constructed) can’t claim the same cultural artifacts. This page compares intercultural communication and intergroup communication.

Origins of the Theories ICC is a study that has been ongoing for more than 50 years. It focuses on the differences between cultures through the way they manage behaviors like gestures and personal space. Watson (2012) has given special attention to understanding different cultures’ communication practices. This includes individualism, collectivism, high and low contexts, etc. The ICC perspective states that an individual must recognize that he is engaging in intercultural communication.

INTERCULTURAL & INTERGROUP COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TOPICS

Communication and Acculturation
– African Communication Methods
Management Theory of Anxiety Uncertainty
– Asian Communication Methods
Bi-lingualism and Multilingualism
Communication and Collective Action
– Cultural patterns and communication
Communication and Disability
Diversity at Work
– Ethnic Media: Their Influence
Ethnographic Perspectives on Culture, Communication
– Ethnolinguistic Vitality, Communication
– Hate Speech, Ethnophaulisms and Hate Speech
Hispanic Communication Methods
Intercultural Communication in Healthcare
– Instruction in Intercultural Exchange
– Intercultural Conflict Styles & Facework
– Cultural Standards
Interethnic relationships in families
– Accommodative Procedures between Groups
Intergroup Communication. Discursive psychology
Interaction between Groups and Communication
– The Impact of Groups on Organizational Settings
– Intergroup Language Attitudes
Marginality and Stigma. Communication
– Media Representations and Group Portrayals
– Immigration and Migration
– Muslim Communication Modes
– Nonverbal communication and culture
– Intergroup Power
– Discriminatory and Prejudiced Communication
Communication and social stereotyping
– Western Communication Methods

The IGC approach, in contrast to ICC was derived from social identity theory. According to this theory, individuals categorize and compare themselves with other people to help them develop a positive self perception. We want to be more supportive of our own ingroups (ingroups) than we are of others (outgroups). Then, we communicate according to these social identities. We communicate with other members to gain membership in an outgroup. This could be used, for example, when immigrants are trying to integrate into a community. SIT does not refer to communication theories, but is a theory that describes intergroup behavior. Communication theories such communication accommodation theory explain how individuals interact with salient outgroups and ingroups in order to communicate.

INTERCULTURAL & INTERGROUP COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS

Wiseman (2002) described the application of ICC competence in helping people from different cultures communicate well with each other. The ICC literature outlines a skill training approach. It requires that individuals have knowledge of their culture, be motivated to communicate and have appropriate communication skills. Interactions may be defined as activities that take place at an interpersonal level.

IGC, however, focuses on interactants implicitly (and often explicitly) accepting the role of representing their respective cultures. For all interactions, it is important to acknowledge that sometimes intergroup identities may take precedence. Individuals who see their own identity as important can use different communication strategies to those who think they are part of a group. The communication process can be affected by whether individuals or groups are considered salient. This will allow for different approaches that may reconstruct the identity of the individual.
A group’s unique identity is expressed through its culture or dialect using specialized terminology or nonverbal communication. This is essential to creating a social identity that members can sustain creatively and vigorously grow. Intercultural communication should not be subsumed or treated as a special instance of intergroup communication. Instead, the two traditions can coalesce into significant synergy.

ASSUMPTIONS BETWEEN THE THOSE THEORIES

IGC theory does not contain certain assumptions. These assumptions are that people who come to a new country from another culture will be placed in an ethno-relative position. They need to be familiar with the cultural values and norms. Effective communication will only occur when the strangers are well-informed about the culture and can communicate efficiently. Despite the best skills and knowledge of each individual, misunderstandings can sometimes be unavoidable. Sociopsychological theories, which emphasize intergroup intercultural communication rather than its interpersonal aspects, address miscommunications and other intercultural tensions.

IGC is very aware of the impact that power and status differentials have on communication behavior. ICC doesn’t consider power as a crucial consideration. Instead, it assumes that competent communication will be the main goal. Effective and competent communication is not always the goal of two people from different cultures who have a history with power differentials and perceived injustices. The training and skills focused on communication are not able to take into account culturally-salient differences in power.

ICC and IGC can encompass a wide range of people. They may include older people, gays, bisexuals or academicians from various disciplines. They may consider themselves to be part of a particular group with unique traits and characteristics. IGC theories make distinctions between “me”, an individual, in an interaction, and “us”, a virtual representative of an organization. Even though intercultural and group perspectives may be used in studies, there are more opportunities to invoke each other’s positions. It is important to bring these theoretical perspectives together to understand and predict what variables determine successful and ineffective interactions.